Author RSS Feed Your Options Privatisation proposed to ease fuel supply
Studies carried out to suggest ways to ensure smooth supply of petroleum products insist there is no alternative to privatisation.
The Action Plan on Petroleum Products Deregulation, 1994, was envisaged
by economist Dr Bishwambher Pyakurel. It was followed by another study
led by former Finance Secretary Bhanu Acharya in 2006. At a time
when the need for privatisation has been strongly felt, considering the
huge losses of NOC, the Action Plan formulated by Dr Pyakurel proposes
certain measures to create a conducive environment for privatisation. Chief
among those are an automatic price adjustment mechanism (to make
domestic prices on par with global market price), providing foreign
currency to private importers, and letting private sector share the
infrastructure with NOC. But other concerns like fuel storage and
subsidies also need to be taken into account before privatisation. It
will be impossible for the private sector to sustain subsidies in
diesel and kerosene. The study hints at the possibility of contracting private oil companies in India, thereby ending the monopoly of Indian Oil Corporation over fuel supply to Nepal. Similarly,
the issue of privatisation was the main concern of the Petroleum
Product Supply and Market Management Study Committee-2006. Former
Finance Secretary and convener of the committee Bhanu Prasad Acharya
too is for the involvement of private sector in oil business.
However, his report suggests fundamental changes in the existing oil
regime and NOC structure. Alternatively, NOC may be brought under a
private management, allowing for greater involvement of private sector. Acharya
emphasises the need for a separate body to regulate oil business
following NOC privatisation. The body will see to it that the industry
is following established market practices, maintaining quality of
products and services and adopting safety measures to handle these
highly inflammable goods. Acharya believes the private sector is
capable of putting together required capital for imports, storage and
other infrastructure. However, the government should allow private
players to use the existing NOC infrastructure (the storage depots at
Amlekhgunj and Thankot, for example). “There is no point in adding
extra infrastructure when the existing ones will suffice,” Acharya says. Deregulation
of petroleum sector seems inevitable in light of the current fuel
crisis. NOC claims that its cumulative losses have reached Rs 15
billion as a result of “subsidies”. There are also entrenched
procedural flaws in NOC’s day-to-day functioning, which in turn have
abetted adulteration and black marketing. According to economist Dr Raghav Dhoj Pant, there is no rationale in subsidising LPG for the relatively well off. As
per Acharya’s report, NOC, with its incompetent and inefficient
top-level managers, needs a complete overhaul prior to its
privatisation. Asked why the two reports were not implemented,
Managing Director of NOC Digambar Jha said NOC had been unable to do so
despite its best efforts. “But I am going to apprise the new minister
(for Commerce and Supplies) of the suggestions made in past studies,”
Jha added. Acharya, for his part, sees political instability as a
hindrance to privatisation of NOC. “The then government was scared of
ramifications of price adjustments, a prerequisite for privatisation
and other structural changes suggested in our report,” he said.
Related News Members's Comments
Currently there are no comments.